Tuesday, March 12, 2013

Falkland Islanders vote overwhelmingly to keep British rule

By Marcos Brindicci and Juan Bustamante

STANLEY, Falkland Islands (Reuters) - Residents of the Falkland Islands voted almost unanimously to stay under British rule in a referendum aimed at winning global sympathy as Argentina intensifies its sovereignty claim, results showed on Monday.

The official count showed 99.8 percent of islanders voted in favor of remaining a British Overseas Territory in the two-day referendum, which was rejected by Argentina as a meaningless publicity stunt. Only three "no" votes were cast.

"Surely this must be the strongest message we can get out to the world," said Roger Edwards, one of the Falklands assembly's eight elected members.

"(The message) that we are content, that we wish to retain the status quo ... with the right to determine our own future and not become a colony of Argentina."

Pro-British feeling is running high in the barren and blustery islands that lie off the tip of Patagonia, and turnout was 92 percent among the 1,649 Falklands-born and long-term residents registered to vote.

Three decades since Argentina and Britain went to war over the far-flung South Atlantic archipelago, residents have been perturbed by Argentina's increasingly vocal claim over the Malvinas - as the islands are called in Spanish.

Local politicians hope the resounding "yes" vote will help them lobby support abroad, for example in the United States, which has a neutral position on the sovereignty issue.

"We're never going to change Argentina's claim and point of view, but I believe there are an awful lot of countries out there that are sitting on the fence ... this is going to show them quite clearly what the people think," Edwards added.

The mood was festive as islanders lined up in the cold to vote in the low-key island capital of Stanley during voting, some wearing novelty outfits made from the red, white and blue Union Jack flag.

"We are British and that's the way we want to stay," said Barry Nielsen, who wore a Union Jack hat to cast his ballot at the town hall polling station in Stanley, where most of the roughly 2,500 islanders live.

PRESSURE ON BRITAIN

Argentina's fiery left-leaning president, Cristina Fernandez, has piled pressure on Britain to negotiate the sovereignty of the islands, something London refuses to do unless the islanders request talks.

Most Latin American countries and many other developing nations have voiced support for Argentina, which has stepped up its demands since London-listed companies started drilling for oil and natural gas off the Falklands craggy coastline.

Government officials in Buenos Aires questioned the referendum's legitimacy. They say the sovereignty dispute must be resolved between Britain and Argentina and cite U.N. resolutions calling on London to sit down for talks.

"This (referendum) is a ploy that has no legal value," said Alicia Castro, Argentina's ambassador to London.

"Negotiations are in the islanders' best interest. We don't want to deny them their identity. They're British, we respect their identity and their way of life and that they want to continue to be British. But the territory they occupy is not British," she told an Argentine radio station.

Argentina has claimed the islands since 1833, saying it inherited them from the Spanish on independence and that Britain expelled an Argentine population.

The war, which killed about 650 Argentines and 255 Britons and ended when Argentina surrendered, is widely remembered in Argentina as a humiliating mistake by the discredited and brutal dictatorship in power at the time.

But most Argentines think the islands rightfully belong to the South American country and they remain a potent national symbol that unites political foes.

Falkland islanders, who are enjoying an economic boom thanks partly to the sale of oil and natural gas exploration licenses, say they do not expect Monday's result to sway Argentina.

"Argentina's stance on the Falklands will stay the same," said Stanley resident Craig Paice, wearing a t-shirt with the slogan "Our Islands, Our Decision" as he waited to vote on Monday.

"But hopefully the world will now listen and know the people of the Falkland Islands have a voice."

(Additional reporting by Magali Cervantes in Stanley and Helen Popper in Buenos Aires; Writing by Helen Popper; Editing by Paul Simao)

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/falkland-islanders-vote-overwhelmingly-keep-british-rule-022644446.html

andrew lloyd webber obscura grok cirque du freak paul pierce pope joan pope joan

Monday, March 11, 2013

Screen Time 28: Kings of the Keynote

Screen Time 28: Kings of the Keynote

I joined Mois?s Chiullan on his 5by5 show, Screen Time last week to talk about how companies communicate with their stakeholders, including investors, developers, and customers/end users. Or in Sony's case with the PS4 event, how they failed to. As Mois?s put it:

In this sibling episode to Critical Path 74, Rene Ritchie joins Mois?s to discuss keynote culture, why and how Sony's PS4 event was a bust, and whether keynotes as we know them are a dying breed.

If you're interested in technology beyond Apple, though compared and contrasted with Apple, give it a listen. And don't miss the After Dark companion show.

Listen or subscribe: 5b5.tv



Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheIphoneBlog/~3/npWv4wXA3q0/story01.htm

brad and angelina herniated disc luke scott tom benson royals nicole richie lyme disease symptoms

MEPs may dilute EU farm reforms

Plans to force farmers to earn their subsidies by protecting the environment may be blocked by MEPs this week.

The European Commission wants farmers to repay society for their subsidies - worth about 50bn euros (?43bn; $65bn) annually - by supporting wildlife.

But farmers are unhappy and have persuaded the European Parliament's agriculture committee to reject key elements of the reform.

Now environmentalists warn that the ?greening? of farming is at risk.

The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) swallows the biggest share of the EU budget.

Initially the subsidies were based on tonnes of crops, or numbers of livestock, but now many farmers are paid around 200 euros per hectare annually for little more than owning fields.

The Commission, which drafts EU laws, says farmers should have to work for part of their subsidies by helping wildlife - diversifying crops, leaving grassland unploughed and creating special ecological areas.

It is known as the ?greening? of the CAP. Environmentalists say the plan is not nearly green enough ? but it was too green for the MEPs? agriculture committee.

It demanded ?flexibility? over the greening rules, leading environmentalists to warn that that some nations would continue to hand out money as usual.

Generous subsidies

The committee further infuriated critics by voting to pay farmers twice over for their greening activities, from two different budgets.

BirdLife Europe said the double funding proposal was ?blatantly unaffordable and shows just how little regard the committee has for the concept of value for money?.

The Commission says the plan is actually against the law.

But the committee went further by rejecting a proposal that farmers should lose subsidies if they break laws governing water, pesticides and hormones. Farmers argued that if they had been fined they should not be punished twice by losing subsidy too.

David Baldock from the Institute of European Environment Policy said: ?This seems a most curious argument. Why should the taxpayer continue to give you subsidy if you are breaking laws??

But he admitted: ?Environmentalists have a struggle to keep the greening of the CAP as it was intended. There are a lot of people in Europe who are perfectly happy with things the way they are.?

Stuart Agnew from the Eurosceptic UK Independence Party (UKIP) told BBC News: ?The CAP is a shambles - it needs to be scrapped and started again from scratch.?

No-one was available to comment from the European farmers? organisation Copa-Cogeca.

A senior member of the Commission told me: ?It is ridiculous and awful that in this day and age we are paying farmers to own land. It makes no economic sense. We should only be paying farmers to produce social goods. Hopefully we will get to that situation one day.?

The European Parliament will debate the reforms on Tuesday and vote on Wednesday.

Follow Roger on Twitter

Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-21718535#sa-ns_mchannel=rss&ns_source=PublicRSS20-sa

king arthur king arthur there will be blood there will be blood nigel barker 420 secret service